A case for social networks (Facebook)

I was surprised to read today in “Next” - Clarín’s issue on new technologies- Tom Hodgkinson’s strong rejection of social networking (actually, I read the Spanish translation by Cristina Sardoy of his article in The Guardian last Jan 14 ; see the original version in English here).
Though I quickly scanned the article online, and am not quite sure the translation (clearly much shorter than the original) totally respects his ideas, but there are some points I’d definitely like to disagree with:

Hodkinson writes:

And does Facebook really connect people? Doesn’t it rather disconnect us…?

I think this argument is as old as the question of computers dehumanizing social relationships… to me, just fear of the unknown. What happens is that the Internet has allowed us to choose who we want to have “around”, making geographical location quite irrelevant.

Hodkington goes on:

since instead of doing something enjoyable such as talking and eating and dancing and drinking with my friends, I am merely sending them little ungrammatical notes and amusing photos in cyberspace, while chained to my desk? A friend of mine recently told me that he had spent a Saturday night at home alone on Facebook, drinking at his desk. What a gloomy image.

Now, there’s no reason why your writing on the Web has to be ungrammatical when your usual writing isn’t, is there? Like all the communication we have, you can choose what to show others… Now, if his friend chooses to stay at home “plugged to the computer” when he does have something to share f2f with friends who are nearby… I’d say he either needs therapy, or is time both of them looked for new friends!

He adds quite a lot about the philosophy and policies advocated by Facebook’s founders and sponsors, an arena where I’m really ignorant and so I’d better not discuss… In favour of objectivity, I must say it is there that Hodkington gave me some food for thought, and started me wondering w”ho is favoured by my practices” (paraphrasing Paolo Freire).

However, it is his conclusion that makes me dismiss it all:

For my own part, I am going to retreat from the whole thing, remain as unplugged as possible, and spend the time I save by not going on Facebook doing something useful, such as reading books. Why would I want to waste my time on Facebook when I still haven’t read Keats’ Endymion? And when there are seeds to be sown in my own back yard? I don’t want to retreat from nature, I want to reconnect with it. … And if I want to connect with the people around me, I will revert to an old piece of technology. It’s free, it’s easy and it delivers a uniquely individual experience in sharing information: it’s called talking.

Now sir, maybe the things I am interested to read are suggested to me by my friends at Facebook? After all, by linking to the “right” people, and then to the friends of those friends (carefully selecting who to add as “my friend” according to my criteria). And in my case, my interest in educating with new technologies is much better fed by browsing websites (like The Guardian’s, which made your opinion available to me!), as the only books in the field are not easy to get and more often than not beyond my budget.

As for nature, maybe it’s the other way about. Maybe the time I spend at Facebook saves me hours of browsing for the links I want to find, and the time and money it’d cost me to travel all around the world to meet the teachers at Webheads in Action and Learning with Computers, among so many who help me keep developing professionally every day!


That’s all for now… It’s not I’m mad about Facebook (as I’ve said somewhere else, I only joined it after Mary Hillis’s kind insistence), but I do believe it’s not more than other tool… It’s the way we use that will make the difference!

BTW, if you want to find me on Facebook, I’m “gladysbaya”… And if you’ve never watched this excellent video yet, do not put it off any longer! (watching it takes just under 5 minutes, I won’t take any responsibility for how long it keeps you thinking about it!):

And now you all know why I’m not a regular poster… I can’t keep my opinions short! :-P

Thanks for your attention,
Gladys

Editing comments at Edublogs

I’ve already shared all this at B4B, but I’d better post it here so that I can find it when I need it…

Carla Raguseo pointed out that (unlike Blogspot), Edublogs allows you to edit comments posted either by yourself or others to your own blogs (Blogger does allow you to delete them, but not edit). It took me a while to find out how to go about it, and this is what I learned then:

  1. Click on Administration/Manage/Comments
  2. then click on Edit for the comment you want to modify or “Mass Edit Mode” to edit it all comments…
  3. The editor for comments has lots of icons that enable WYSIWYG when editing comments, quite similar to what you get when entering posts (just more limited, no options for embedding.) Pretty easy to format a just entered comment! I’d just tried HTML for link in the comments, and they worked! There’s no preview option, but it’s you can always edit them later!
  4. You can even “unapprove” already published comments!

Comparing Blogger and Edublogs: At Blogger, I can delete comments I’ve entered to any blog (not only my blogs) by clicking on the grey trashbin in the comments blog… Is there any way to take my words back in comments I post to other people’s Edublogs, apart from emailing the owner and requesting they delete my comment? Not that I need to, just exploring the options! I think I’m finally “falling in love” with Edublogs… not as intuitive as Blogger, so I’ll stick to that one for my class blogs for the time being, I hope I’ll be posting more regularly to my Edublog myself!

Gladys

Teaching writing, teaching life…

Co-presenting with Bee Dieu for Blogging for Beginners, Aaron Campbell said:

“Over time…
Authoritarian and Vertical Classrooms
Create Authoritarian and Vertical Minds”

(click here to watch their wonderful presentation on “Involving students in Blogging“)

Having watched (click on the grey triangle over the image below to see the video):

Web 2.0 The Machine is Us/ing Us (4:31 mins)

by Digital Ethnography (a working group of Kansas State University students and faculty dedicated to exploring and extending the possibilities of digital ethnography, led by Professor Wesch) today,…

I wonder whether we writing teachers can keep denying that…

“Over time…
teaching unilinear writing, fixed in time
creates unilinear thinkers, unwilling to question
and mistrustful of lifelong learning”.

Gladys (rethinking my teaching practices ;)!)

NOTE: first time embedding a video in one of my blogs! :D

Wikis as collaboration tools

Educared@ndonos: el wiki y la colaboración

The document linked above reports on a project I have implemented during this school year, integrating a wiki (hosted at http://theoryofeducation.pbwiki.com/) into the curriculum of “Theory of Education”, a subject I teach at a private teacher’s training college (all lessons are held in English, to favour the trainees acquisition of the foreign language). I wrote it in Spanish to submit it to a competition held by Educar-Intel. (don’t look for my name among the winners! :-P)

The class was made up by 23 first-year students, who had just entered the institution. We met only once a week for 80 minutes, and the school had no access to computers.

By integrating a wiki into our curriculum tools (adapting a writing task assigned on previous school years) , I aimed at:

  • transforming my f2f course into a blended course
  • fostering group cohesion
  • promoting peer collaboration
  • introducing teacher trainees into the educational potential of new technologies
  • You may prefer to have a look at the slides I created to go with the report. Even if you cannot understand Spanish, the images on slides #3 and 12 can help you see the effect on wiki integration on the student’s perception of the writing task.

    As indicated in the report, the experience was really positive. I’m determined to repeat it again in future school years! :-D

    Gladys